The worlds smallest Slony cluster?

We recently updated on of our Slony clusters. I think it at least used to qualify as one of the worlds smallest ones:

  • Two nodes (obvious minimum)
  • one database (that's a given)
  • with one table
  • with one column
  • with one row

Now, we recently doubled the size of this cluster. It now has a whopping two columns in the table. The second column being updated by a trigger, so it's still only one column updated by the end user (well, application). But it's two columns to be replicated!

So what does this prove? Really, not much, but at least: Slony certainly scales "downward" just fine. It feels like a bit overhead to set it up for something like this, but it works just fine. Even in a small database, triggers can be very useful - regardless of what the documentation of a certain other database used to say before... And even in a trivial case like this, statement based replication simply does not work reliably*. You need something that's data based - something that the same other database is actually recognizing now and will be including the next version...


Conferences

I speak at and organize conferences around Open Source in general and PostgreSQL in particular.

Upcoming

SCALE+PGDays
Mar 2-5, 2017
Pasadena, California, USA
Open Source Infrastructure @ SCALE
Mar 2, 2017
Pasadena, California, USA
Confoo Montreal 2017
Mar 8-10, 2017
Montreal, Canada
Nordic PGDay 2017
Mar 21, 2017
Stockholm, Sweden
pgDay.paris 2017
Mar 23, 2017
Paris, France
PGCon 2017
May 23-26, 2017
Ottawa, Canada

Past

FOSDEM + PGDay 2017
Feb 2-4, 2017
Brussels, Belgium
PGConf.Asia 2016
Dec 2-3, 2016
Tokyo, Japan
Berlin PUG
Nov 17, 2016
Berlin, Germany
PGConf.EU 2016
Nov 1-4, 2016
Tallinn, Estonia
Stockholm PUG 2016/5
Oct 25, 2016
Stockholm, Sweden
More past conferences